Showing posts with label hunger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hunger. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

Building a Catholic Food System

Mass is a celebration of the Eucharist – the body of Christ, the physical manifestation of the divine presence on Earth.  Millions of Catholics go to mass every weekend and celebrate the Eucharist, and Christians of other denominations similarly celebrate the meal Jesus had with his disciples through weekly services. But what could it mean to take the celebration Eucharist even more literally, to live out the spirituality to which our faith calls us?  
“Give us this day, our daily bread,” we pray.  How can we let Christ live through us in a way that better helps to ensure the world’s hungry receive their daily bread?  This question is one that necessitates seeing ourselves as interconnected with our brothers and sisters across the world, so we can maintain the spiritual stamina needed to create a more equitable food system.

Photo credit: Gerald Wen, member of Harmony Farm CSA & St. John the Baptist/Holy Cross Justice, Peace & Integrity of Creation (JPIC) Care for Creation committee. Used by permission.

In December 2016, I helped to facilitate a food justice breakout session within a Catholics of Color Climate Justice workshop, organized by the Franciscan Action Network in partnership with Climate Reality Project. One participant asked how we might build a food system based on Catholic principles.  I started brainstorming what this might entail.  
A food system based on Catholic principles would value the five components of the Good Food Purchasing Policy of the Center for Good Food Purchasing: local economies, environmental sustainability, valued workforce, animal welfare, and nutrition.  A Catholic food system would care for the hungriest among us, both on the other side of the world as well as the other side of the street, making sure everyone not only has access to food but gets fresh, quality, nutritious food, that doesn’t degrade environmental sustainability but promotes ecological well-being instead.
Picture this: going to church and picking up a farm share with food grown on an organic and biodynamic farm owned by a religious congregation, and having surplus food that is grown be donated to the church’s food pantry or soup kitchen, thanks to the support of other parishioners who can help to subsidize the additional food.  Having quotes from Pope Francis’ encyclical “Laudato Si” sent out in your weekly emails reminding you to pick up your vegetables from the farm. Coming together with parishioners to discuss integral ecology and spirituality – how our faith informs how we live out our engagement with the earth. And having the opportunity to visit the farm, meet the people who are growing your food, and even pick some of the produce yourself.
That is exactly what is happening through Blessed Sacrament Church on the Upper West Side of Manhattan in New York City. Blessed Sacrament has partnered with a lay Catholic community known as Benincasa (after St. Catherine Benincasa of Siena) that is supported by the Dominican Sisters of Blauvelt. Benincasa Community and the Social Action Committee at Blessed Sacrament host a “Community-Supported Agriculture” program and support the church soup kitchen in providing farm-fresh food to the community. Grown on Harmony Farm and offered alongside a discussion group and excerpts from Laudato Si in a weekly newsletter, the food provided by Harmony Farm is spiritual as well as physical nourishment.

Photo credit: Kelly Moltzen, taken at the Care for Creation retreat at Harmony Farm

2016 was the first year of the farm-to-church partnership. In 2017, Benincasa is starting to expand the program to other parishes.  The parish of Holy Cross/St. John the Baptist, run by the Capuchin Franciscans, has taken up the challenge, and parishioners have decided to donate funds for a bulk farm share that will be purchased for a new soup kitchen. The soup kitchen will be parishioner-led, too: several people have already taken the Food Protection Course and are now licensed to supervise the many volunteers who are ready to prepare food and service the soup line.
Biodynamic, organic farms such as Harmony Farm are practicing regenerative agriculture, which can trap carbon in the air into the ground, thereby helping to reduce carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. If regenerative agriculture was practiced globally, 100 percent of current, annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions would be sequestered (1). This is a refreshing alternative to food from a system that is a significant contributor to climate change and environmental degradation.
Because of our industrial growing practices and cultural habits, red meat and dairy contribute nearly half of the greenhouse gas emissions of all foods.  The beauty of eating a plant-based diet with foods grown locally, organically, and even biodynamically, is that we can build a new food system while simultaneously providing climate solutions.  Creating a system that feeds the hungry with nourishing food from the earth also puts the power and responsibility back into parishes and takes it away from the food industry, a harmful system that perpetuates food insecurity as Andrew Fisher recently made clear in his book Big Hunger: The Unholy Alliance Between Corporate America and Anti-Hunger Groups.
Ideally we can work towards the full meaning of the root of the word charity (caritas), or “expressing one’s love for God through love for one’s neighbor and oneself,” a love that includes dignity of the receiver, and also keep in mind the roots of charity in the Judaic tradition, where the highest level of charity is when receivers are able to become self-reliant.
To make more sustainably, ethically grown produce available at an affordable price for all, we would need a Farm Bill that is committed to biodiversity and incentivizes produce rather than subsidizes corn and soy as staple crops.  More affordable fruits and vegetables would also support equity for communities of color that are disproportionately affected by health disparities. We also need to make sure children are being taught from a young age about healthy and plant based eating, and provide them with opportunities to learn how food connects them to the earth and others.  There is a great model for this in WANDA, or Women Advancing Nutrition, Dietetics & Agriculture.  In ensuring that young girls are educated about the healing power of food, we can build a new generation of leaders who have the capacity to sustain themselves and one another.  
By focusing on growing more fruits and vegetables and promoting a plant-based diet, we can also reduce our reliance on the resource-intensive and often unethical practices involved in raising animals for meat.  The Saint Francis Alliance is a network of Catholics who advocate for vegetarianism because they recognize the inherent value and dignity of animals, and know that an ecosystem which treats animals well will also be one that is sustainable and healthy for humans.
Equipping ourselves to build a food system that honors the dignity of all of creation promotes improved food and water security for everyone, which can also help reduce violence and conflict especially in areas where resource scarcity is a threat to human livelihood.  Yet creating this new food system is not an easy feat: in order to accomplish the task, we must recognize the challenges that come with defending creation, ethical treatment of farmworkers, and the poor’s access to land. This became a lifelong struggle for Cesar Chavez, and Oscar Romero was assassinated standing up against corruption and in the name of Christ, and for the right of the poor to have access to land.
A food system based on Catholic principles is one based on the premise of integral ecology – recognizing our profound interdependence with the earth and one another.  It’s based on Catholic Social Teaching, including honoring the dignity of all, rights of workers, a for the poor and vulnerable, and the care of creation.  And it’s one that allows us to fully live out the three dimensions of eco-conversion: the spiritual dimension, lifestyle dimension, and advocacy dimension. It’s one based on grace, where the incarnate is not desecrated, but its sacredness is instead honored as we share meals through community.
(also posted at christianfoodmovement.org)  

(1)  Rodale Institute (2014). Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Climate Change: A Down-to-Earth Solution to Global Warming. This compelling statistic is backed up by Rodale’s Farming Systems Trial (FST), the longest-running test comparing organic and conventional cropping systems.

Monday, October 5, 2015

Faith in Action Food Summit: October 22

Breaking Bread Together to Address Hunger & Health

Faith calls us to be present to the world’s realities: a faith life which is disconnected from the needs of one’s physical body and the world around us is not good for one’s physical or spiritual well-being. Instead, we are called to create communities where everyone is free from disease, no one goes hungry, workers are treated well, and where children are nourished and ready to succeed. In such a community, people can eat with dignity around the table together, and food is affordable and accessible for all. This is the world we are called to co-create with the universal Creator. National Food Day – a nation-wide celebration of real food – is an opportunity for faith leaders to come together to celebrate real food and see what we can do to create a food system that feeds and nourishes with the bounty of the earth, rather than one that harms human health and the ecosystems surrounding us.

The Bronx Multi-Faith Advisory Group cordially invites you to gather for a Faith in Action Food Summit on October 22nd from 10am-1pm at the Bronx Museum of the Arts (1040 Grand Concourse, Bronx NY 10456). This is an opportunity for faith leaders to gain a deeper understanding of the ways people of faith can get involved in creating an equitable and sustainable food system that promotes health and reduces hunger. The Summit will equip participants with messages that can be taken back to congregations the following weekend, putting Bronx-based efforts to create a holistic food system on the map alongside others from across the country who will also be celebrating Food Day, which is held every year on October 24.




Sunday, December 1, 2013

Farmworkers and Franciscans

In my previous post, I mentioned how there have been people fasting in a tent on the national mall for immigration reform since November 12th - including over Thanksgiving. I found it more than a little insensitive that most Americans could enjoy a day of feasting in recognition of how welcoming the Native Americans were to pilgrims, while living in the bliss of ignorance or apathy that Congress is stalling a vote on immigration reform - reform that could improve the lives of 11 million aspiring Americans who are currently suffering the impact of deportations, deaths on the border, exploitation at work, and fear of living in the shadows with no path to citizenship.  So I posted about the immigration reform efforts and fasted for part of the day, which made me more conscious and grateful for the food I was eating. But it also made me more conscious of two other things. Seeing food scraps thrown away reminded me of the absurd amount of food that gets thrown away every year (1.3 billion tons) - an unconscionable sin in a world of abundance where so many go hungry. Secondly, preparing food without being able to eat it right away made me think of the plight of the farmworkers who grew the food, as farmers are some of the hungriest people in the world.

This past week (November 24-30) was the second annual International Food Workers Week, which "brings awareness to the issues facing food workers, supports their organizing efforts for fair, sustainable jobs and promotes solidarity among workers all across the food chain." Yet in the US alone, there are nearly 20 million Americans who are often poorly paid, exploited, and can't even afford to put food on their own tables.

Meanwhile, less than two weeks ago (November 19) was the feast day of St. Elizabeth of Hungary, the patron saint of Secular Franciscans - Christians "embedded in the world" who have made a commitment to follow the lifestyle of St. Francis. From Lori Pieper, SFO we learn that St. Elizabeth was a food justice advocate at heart: while born into royalty, she "dedicated herself to the relief of the poor" and "refused any food that might have been unjustly exacted from the peasants by her husband's officials."

What implications does this have for those who strive to follow in the footsteps of St. Francis of Assisi?  St. Francis saw everyone and everything as his brothers and sisters, seeing God in the eyes of the poor and in the earth alike. He sought to establish right relationship with creation and with all of humankind.

From Franciscan Br. Keith Warner who has experience working for justice for farmworkers and writes about the close relationship between Franciscan Friars and César Chávez, we can come to understand that ministering to and spending time with the poor and those closest to the earth - to those who grow the very food which we take for granted and eat every day - can have significant spiritual implications as well as deepen our interest in grassroots social movements.

As we finish up our Thanksgiving leftovers, enter into the Advent season and enjoy the bounty of the earth throughout the year, let us not forget the plight of the workers who grow, prepare and serve our food. The Food Chain Workers Alliance organizes and supports workers throughout the year on improving the livelihoods of workers throughout the food chain.   Here is a TEDx talk by Joann Lo about her experiences working with the Food Chain Workers Alliance:


Currently, we have an opportunity to stand with 8 million food system and 21 additional low-wage workers in their request that Congress raise the minimum wage:  in early December, the US Senate is expected to vote on a "Motion to Proceed" on the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013, which would raise the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour over the next three years and the tipped minimum wage from $2.13 to 70% of the regular minimum wage.

Let's stand in solidarity with food workers. Here are a couple of actions you can take to learn more and support fair wages and sustainable jobs for workers all across the food chain:

Monday, November 25, 2013

Confessions of a Food Justice Advocate

I know it’s been a long time since I’ve written regularly on here. But I want to get back into it. Like the phoenix is reborn to new life, I am hoping the lessons I’ve learned and insight I’ve gained over the past few years will allow me to add life to this blog. 

We often hear that the perfect is the enemy of the good.  A trap I fell into, wanting to make this blog more than it needed to be and therefore not finding the time to write on it at all.  I didn’t have a strong enough conviction that none of us is perfect and we must share what we can, in humility, in order to grow.

We will be most alive, successful and happy when we are most ourselves. But we can’t fully become our true selves until we face our own insecurities.

I’ve been challenged a lot recently and have felt compelled to take a “SNAP (food stamp) challenge” – or in other words learn what it’s like for low-income people to try to eat healthy on a very restricted budget.  It’s something I’ve known for a while I should do.  How can I best communicate to low-income folks about eating healthy if I haven’t lived through and experienced doing it myself? 

I was very fortunate growing up to have had a mother who cooked great family meals every night.  It wasn’t processed, packaged foods – she made real, wholesome meals, practically every night of the week. I didn’t comprehend how important this skill of cooking and knowing how to prepare food really was, and took advantage of it, not learning the skills myself so that I would be able to use them later on in life.  This was all before I decided to study nutrition in college, of course. I had no idea my career was going to take me down a path that would bring me back to the importance of food and knowing how to prepare it. I never really understood how lucky I was to have those family meals until I was out own my own. In college, I was fortunate to have had great dining halls, but it left me with a nagging feeling that post-college I would not have the skills to prepare meals myself on a regular basis. I could go shopping and follow a recipe, but is not something I was committed to doing on a regular basis because I was so committed to so many other extra-curriculars.  I continued on this path in grad school and afterwards, working for an organization that has taught me about health disparities which fostered in me a real passion for food justice.  I’ve focused so much of my time over the past several years on seeking food justice because it bothers me that so many people don’t have the ability to afford healthy foods and don’t have access to things like fresh fruits and vegetables and the like.   But in retrospect some of this passion may have really just been a way of hiding from the challenge of figuring out how to eat healthy on a budget so I could share this wisdom with others. 

I didn’t see a point in figuring out great meal plans for myself if the population I was working with wouldn’t be able to relate to it. So I didn’t do it.  I live in a house where we care about building community and have weekly dinner nights where we share a meal with our housemates and neighbors/friends. So once a week I have my meals taken care of (once a month usually I commit to preparing the meal).  Many of the other nights of the week I have typically been out at meetings/events (where sometimes a meal is provided) or I’ve worked too late at night to come home and want to cook  (especially in a kitchen that’s over-crowded with food and dirty dishes your other housemates have left lying around).  I’ve also not been very structured about using the time I do have (usually on weekends) to plan out my meals for the week.  I’ve tended to stick with very simple dinners for myself that probably wouldn’t satisfy anyone but me.  A very basic kale salad for dinner?  Ok.  Or an egg or two with salt and pepper - maybe with some bread lying around.  A roasted acorn squash with maple syrup.  A potato or sweet potato.  In the summer, sautéed eggplant and squash from the farmer’s market.  Only when making meals that involve other people have I been more diligent about trying to prepare a balanced meal with carbs, protein and vegetables.   And for lunch, I must confess a typical day consists of a trip out of the office to Pret a Manger for a basic (usually vegetarian) sandwich, which wastes so much more packaging than if I had packed my lunch myself.

Another challenge for me is when shopping at a grocery store, trying to find foods that were packaged in as little an amount of plastic & material as possible, because unnecessarily filling up landfills, clogging oceans and killing animals with our trash just doesn’t sit right with me. Which has led me to often shop at a farmer’s market (where I can use a reusable bag for the vegetables) or participate in a community supported agriculture / farm share program to get fresh, local vegetables, straight from the farm, without all the middle-men steps and relying on the broken industrialized food system.

But there are still many lessons we can learn from each other in trying to eat healthy for ourselves and our families. And I’m committed to seeing how we can all learn from each other – I think it will lead to a more fulfilling life if we can provide wholesome, nutritious homecooked meals for ourselves and our families more often.  Last week I made a Lentil & Mushroom Shepherd’s Pie which tasted delicious and I’ve been able to get several servings of leftovers out of it too. (Other recipes I’ve made in the past you can view on my Pinterest Recipe page).

Some geniuses recently came out with the “Plant Based on a Budget” website with recipes and meal plans for eating tasty, wholesome meals without spending too much money.  Also, a few members of the Hunger & Environmental Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group have committed to taking the SNAP challenge and some of their experiences are being posted to the HEN Facebook page.  HEN member Karen Ehrens, who inspired others to begin this project a few months ago when she took the SNAP challenge, collected her experience in an article you can read here. In addition, Registered Dietitian & Secular Franciscan Stacey Antine was recently challenged by the Bergen Record (the major daily paper in Bergen County, NJ) to shop healthy on a SNAP budget of $146 for a family of 4 – and was able to do it, documenting here experiences here.
While I haven’t yet figured out a meal plan for myself to eat healthy on a SNAP budget, I would like to make a goal of learning to do this better over the next several months – and trying to keep this up as best I can afterwards too. If anyone would like to join me, below are the guidelines offered by HEN member Garnel Bruell:

SNAP Challenge Guidelines
How much money will you be limited to? Please see the attached chart that shows the maximum benefits / family members. And note that since November 1st, this amount has been reduced to the pre-2009 Recovery Act levels.
What else can you cook with? Although this is a call all your own, I would say don’t feel the need to buy additional cooking oils or spices. You could deliberately limit your spice use to things like salt/pepper and homegrown spices, but ultimately this is your decision. 


Especially in this time of Thanksgiving when so many people will be reminded of their constant struggle to put food on the table for their families, may we be grateful for the food that we do have and strive to eat simple, wholesome meals so that others may do the same. 

Monday, April 9, 2012

Diet for a Small Planet: Lessons for the Long Haul

Last September, I attended the 40th anniversary celebration of Frances Moore Lappé's book "Diet for a Small Planet" in New York City, entitled "Feeding Hope, Living Democracy."  At this event I heard Frances say that "hunger is not caused by a scarcity of food, but a scarcity of democracy" - a quote which truly intrigued me.  (How ironic that the event was held only five days after the start of Occupy Wall Street!)  
While my reading list is always umpteen books long, I figured Diet for a Small Planet should be pretty high on my priority list.  I'd already read her daughter Anna's book, "Diet for a Hot Planet", and have a lot of respect for them both as women in the food movement who also support Oxfam America and HEN.  Today I finished reading Book 1 of "Diet for a Small Planet," and I will say it definitely lived up to its reputation. What I could not believe is how everything Frances wrote about 20, 40 years ago (1971 edition updated in 1991) is still just as relevant today as ever.  We still have the same issues with our food system, but the stories of struggles and successes in overcoming food injustices all over the world are just as inspiring as ever.
Working to change the food system is a daunting task, because the roots of the issue are so multifaceted and cannot be solved with one solution.  It's easy to get overwhelmed and not know what to do first, as happens over and over again in my life in NYC.  But Frances gives some words of encouragement, from the lives of some people whose names still ring a bell 30 years later.  From the life of Harry Chapin, co-founder of World Hunger Year (now WhyHunger) and namesake of the Harry Chapin Media Awards which were created to encourage the media to "tell the story of hunger and poverty," Frances tells us to use what we have.  Well, I have the experiences of life and the books I've read and films I've seen, and this blog, so can write about what I know.  Meanwhile, Oxfam America has relationships with many famous music groups across the country who can continue in the vein of Harry Chapin and encourage musicians to speak out against hunger and poverty.
Frances next talks about how Joan Gussow - the matriarch of the "eat-locally-think-globally food movement," source of inspiration for Michael Pollan, and professor emerita at Teachers College, Columbia University - believes that her decision to study nutrition was probably the "first real decision in her whole life."  She struggled past the dull image of nutrition to learn the science of how food works in the body, and as a result has earned the respect of people interested in bridging the gap between studying food from a scientific perspective and learning about where food comes from... the ground.  I picked up a copy of her book "Growing, Older" when at the NY Botanical Gardens last year and look forward to reading it someday.
Frances tells the story of Michael Jacobson from Center for Science in the Public Interest, a highly respectable organization which has gained a lot of publicity within the last year since CSPI re-launched the annual Food Day initiative on October 24, 2011. Mike Jacobson started off studying biochemistry, and wanted to do something to touch more immediate social problems than could be solved in a chemistry laboratory, so he started looking into the hazards of food additives as an intern with Ralph Nader.  (Fortunately for us, the research into food additives that Mr. Jacobson started in the 1970's has evolved into a food additive safety database available online and on phone apps, called Chemical Cuisine.)
It was also interesting to read about a Nestlé infant-formula boycott at the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility, and to think about how the ICCR could become more engaged around food justice issues in the future (perhaps through the food justice work that NY Faith & Justice has started? hmm....).
Frances Moore Lappé gives us some other tips in the chapter "Lessons for the Long Haul" that are of note.  These include:
  • working with others - finding a core group who can push you further than when trying to work on the issue alone
  • using the direct experience of oppression - whether placed in a situation involuntarily or voluntarily
  • remaining critical of oneself and one's organization - such as Larry Simon's experience with working with Oxfam America, when "he concluded that Oxfam should not work in certain countries where government repression is so strong that it precludes the existence of any organization working for redistribution of power, the only kind of organization which Oxfam wants to support" 
  • hard work and balance - hard work and self-discipline are important, and balance important so as to prevent burnout; but some of us have recognized that working for social change is incredibly rewarding, makes life interesting, and gives us the opportunity to work with people who are equally inspiring and passionate about social change and food justice. 
There is still so much more to learn and so much more to share.  (I did not even touch upon the books' themes of citizen democracy, meat's impact on the world, or protein complementarity in this post!)  But when you surround yourself with incredible people, read books by inspiring visionaries, and stand on the shoulders of the giants who have paved the way before us - anything is possible.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

CLEAN Water for Life

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010
6:00-8:30pm

NYU School of Law
Vanderbilt Hall, Room 204
40
Washington Square South
RSVP:
nyuworldwaterday@gmail.com


According to the World Health Organization, 884 million people—roughly one in eight of the world's population—do not have access to safe water. With less than 1% of all fresh water on Earth fit for human consumption, scientists predict that two-thirds of the global population could face conditions of water scarcity by 2025.

As the most essential element to life, water issues are intimately linked to public health, human rights, female education, economic development, food security, and environmental sustainability. Please join us for a film screening and panel discussion on the impacts of the global water crisis and the importance of increasing access to safe and affordable water worldwide.

Film Screening: Water First, produced by Amy Hart

Synopsis: Through the inspiring story of Charles Banda, a local fireman turned waterman who has drilled over 800 wells for impoverished communities in Malawi, it becomes apparent why clean water should be first if we are genuinely committed to reaching the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and reducing poverty and the suffering it causes in developing nations.

Panel Discussion: Exploring Perspectives on Water and Development

Natasha Iskander, NYU Wagner School of Public Service – Moderator
Elizabeth Sepper, NYU Law School Center for Human Rights and Global
Justice
- Water rights and women in Haiti
Margaret Batty, WaterAid - Hygiene, sanitation and sustainability of
water projects
Amy Hart, Water First - Water and the Millennium Development Goals
Dave Andrews, Food and Water Watch - Water and food security
Sara Pesek, Syracuse University Environmental Finance Center – Water
in the U.S.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

The End of Poverty?

The End Of Poverty? from Philippe Diaz on Vimeo.

This Saturday I went to Radical Living for a New York Faith & Justice house gathering/film screening to watch The End of Poverty? This film doesn't just give us the sobering statistics about global poverty, but also tells us how economic disparities came about and many ideas for what needs to be done to fix the situation. I won't bore you with too many statistics, but just some overall things to think about. Poverty as the world knows it today comes from structural injustices that allow big, multinational corporations to exert an unfair influence on developing countries. As the film points out the Global South is actually financing the North "to the tune of about $200 billion every year." Crops and resources are grown and taken from developing countries (the growers being paid way under the cost of production for these goods), brought to developed countries like the US for processing, and then shipped back out to other countries. When the product gets back to developing countries that import goods from the US, it is still cheaper to buy than from growers who try to make a living off of selling crops directly to their countrymen. This is exactly what had led to developing countries becoming dependent on imports from places like the US, and is exactly what happened in Haiti with the rice crop (here's a video).

Why don't governments say no to these trade agreements? I've heard from several people who have worked and lived in Africa that there is no government accountability and regulations are not enforced. However, as I learned today representatives from large multinational corporations (of course, Monsanto comes to mind) insidiously make deals with politicians, promising them money and threatening them to not carry out their campaign platforms. This leads to poor accountability for everyone in the country and lets the big corporations privatize and monopolize the country and its resources.

Additionally, as pointed out in the film, many agricultural practices today are the same as slavery used to be – except today, the workers haven't rebelled, and their employers aren't responsible for them. "Back then, the boss was the slave's owner. He had to take care of the slave's health and food. He had to take care of shelter, even if it was the slave's quarters. Today the boss has no such concerns."

The End of Poverty? focused a lot on the history of colonialism and capitalism as a central cause of poverty, and explains how in order to have wealth in capitalist societies, we have to create poverty in the south. "There is no other way." And unfortunately in the past 25 years or so economic disparities have been getting wider. Not only that, but the countries with the biggest income disparities are also the ones with the highest rates of violence. We do not see this violence in the poorest of the poor countries.

The existence of the poor, underserved workers means that we can buy products for 10% of the cost of production – an issue which has far-reaching implications for the health of consumers and the environment. We are currently using 30% more than what the earth can regenerate; in order for everyone to live like we do in America, we would need six planets; while if everyone were living like people in Burkina Faso, we would only need 1/10 of the planet. As an example of what goes on with the food industry in America, watch The True Cost of Food.

Some other discussion which came about from watching the film included a discussion about the term "developing." Did the film glorify indigenous peoples? I thought this was similar to Avatar. How much should we really be encouraging "developing" countries to become more industrialized? What third world countries need is a means to have their needs met: clean water, public health measures, adaptation to climate change, and ownership of land so they can grow food for themselves. Yes, some countries need roads and education and sustainable technology, but we need to make sure we don't push the development of industrialization in the same way the "developed" countries of the Global North came about. Poor use of resources is exactly what has led to the social injustices and climate change issues we worry about today. Perhaps we need a new term to clarify meeting the needs of poor countries. And of course, these needs need to be identified by the community in question. Telling people what they need without understanding their situation doesn't help anyone and is disrespectful.

With that said, there are some changes to be made which can indeed help bring many people out of poverty. Some solutions for ending poverty pointed out in the film (listed out clearly in a space where you can sign a petition to mobilize support for change) include ending the monopoly over natural resources and at least 51% local communal ownership in corporations, redistribution of land to farmers, a cap on exports, a worldwide subsidy for organic agriculture, and cancellation of third world debt (such as that vowed by the G7 in cancelling Haiti's debt). Others include ending child labor under the age of 16 with a creation of a subsidy for scholarship, getting rid of the tax on basic consumption and labor and instead having a 2% worldwide tax on property ownership (except basic habitation for the poor), ensuring an equal voting system in international organizations such as IMF, World Bank, WTO, and of course a commitment by industrialized countries to decrease carbon emission by 50% over a ten-year period.

How can this all be funded? I vote for everyone chipping in to the first non-for-profit global lottery dedicated to sustainability – multinational corporations included.

I also vote for new accountability for multinational corporations – such as limiting the reach of Monsanto, the global fishing industry (which has overstepped its boundaries so much that many of the world's fish are in danger of extinction – no more fish by 2048), fast food and junk food companies (which have already contributed to the nutrition transition – obesity occurring in the hungry even in third world countries), and infant formula companies (the last thing third world countries need is to be told their breastmilk isn't good enough. Breastmilk has so many more benefits than infant formula it's unbelievable. In Ghana they have a saying that goes something like "bottle fed babies are stupid, breastfed babies are smart." Instead money could be given to mothers so they can grow and buy food for themselves – the only reason breastfed infants would be malnourished is because the mother is malnourished. And money could be given to mothers in the form of conditional cash transfers which would ensure children were educated and kept healthy, in exchange for money for food).

Sunday, June 7, 2009

The Home Project

This is by far the most clear, comprehensive, and easily accessible video on the state of our world and the impact that human beings are having on it. It's an hour and a half long; please watch it, and share it with everyone you know - not for my sake, but for your sake, everyone else's that lives on Planet Earth, and future generations. Oh yeah, and the sake of our Planet.

The Home Project


P.S. It's on YouTube, so it's free!

Friday, April 10, 2009

Changing the systems

I found today's change.org topics to be great ones as usual, but at least today I have time to write about them. The first one is about justice in the prison system. A couple of excerpts I found particularly good:

"What significance did 20 years have? From my perspective, we need to reevaluate this misguided concept of justice that only recognizes time. Ours is a society that strives toward enlightenment, yet we incarcerate more people per capita than any other nation."

"I propose that we stop relying upon the turning of calendar pages to measure justice. A far more effective corrections system would measure justice by the efforts an offender makes to reconcile with society. Such a system would require a fundamental reform."

"Warehousing humanity doesn’t reduce crime. Education reduces crime."

And here's a video by Tony, a homeless veteran who describes why he panhandles and how he makes ends meet:


Tony from invisible people on Vimeo.

Thankfully, I can be proud of my Representative, John Hall, who yesterday got President Obama to approve the veterans programs he's been supporting since coming to Congress. Read more about it here.

This doesn't mean we should continue to ignore the people on the streets (as we're all guilty of doing more often than not, I'm sure), but it least the video of Tony gives us some insight into their lives so we can understand where they're coming from. Let's help prevent this from happening by improving the education system and the prison system, and help get these guys off the streets and into jobs, such as these green-collar jobs discussed by Van Jones.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Stunting in Uganda

Here's another term paper I just wrote:

Kelly Moltzen
Final Paper
E33.2314: International Health and Development
December 17, 2008

Political, Social, and Economic Contributors to Stunting in Uganda

The prevalence of stunted growth in Eastern Africa due to undernutrition is the highest in the world and has serious implications for maternal and child health (Black et al., 2008). In Uganda, where nearly half (49%) of the population is under the age of 15 (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002), the national average of stunting in children younger than five years old is 32% (UNICEF, 2008). Prevalence of stunting is generally highest for the poorest segments of the population (Black et al., 2008), with this number reaching up to 54% in the war-torn northeastern region of Karamoja (Africa News, 2007a). Stunting is associated with higher mortality and lower cognitive development. It therefore has widespread implications not just for an individual’s development, but also for the development of entire regions (Jilcott, Masso, Ickes, Myhre, & Myhre, 2007). Stunting has been found to be the best predictor of human capital, as “there is compelling evidence that malnourished children are unproductive as adults” (Africa News, 2008). Therefore, the prevention of stunting has the potential to bring about “important health, educational, and economic benefits” (Victora et al., 2008). The underlying causes of maternal and child mortality include poorly resourced health and nutrition services, food insecurity, and inadequate feeding practices, inadequate access to safe water and sanitation (UNICEF, 2008). However, there are even more basic social, economic, and political causes that contribute to the lack of capital necessary to prevent these underlying causes (Black et al., 2008). In Uganda, these include poverty, political unrest, misplaced policy decisions and interventions, and the discrimination and exclusion of mothers and children.

Stunting is defined as height-for-age less than -2 z-scores (Jilcott et al., 2007); the average Ugandan child falls one standard deviation below the international norms (Alderman, 2007). This restriction of a child’s potential growth is evidence of chronic undernutrition, leads to irreversible impairment, is associated with increased risk of death, and could potentially affect future generations. For instance, maternal short stature adversely affects pregnancy outcomes (Black et al., 2008). Research shows that it is much more efficient to prevent chronic undernutrition and its devastating effects than to attempt interventions later on in the lifecourse (Africa News, 2008), as the critical period of development occurs during the first two years of life. However, the Ministry of Health in Uganda has historically focused its childhood nutrition programs on children who are already underweight (Africa News, 2008), a misdirected intervention that has had serious consequences.

Northern Uganda is burdened with great deals of civil strife. Political instability in Uganda is associated with increased contributory factors to malnutrition, poor economic growth, worse health service delivery by government, local, and international agencies, and higher child mortality rates, as compared to times in the country’s history that saw more political stability. In a study of the Bundibugyo District of Uganda, where the stunting rate in children is 44.8%, students ranked last in recent secondary school standardized leaving exams (Jilcott et al., 2007). This rural, marginalized population is still recovering from Allied Democratic Force rebel attacks that occurred in the late 1990’s, during which people had to live in Internally Displaced People (IDP) camps. Malnutrition, malaria, tuberculosis, and sickle cell disease are common among children in Bundibugyo (Jilcott et al., 2007).

Social aspects such as gender inequality play a large role in health and stunting rates in Uganda. In a country where many families already struggle to get a meal on the table, women and children traditionally eat last in the household, after men (Nadakavukaren, 2006). “To reverse the trend of gender inequality, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) recommends the empowering of women in politics, arguing this has the potential to change society” (Africa News, 2007c; UNICEF, 2008). UNICEF’s State of the World’s Children 2007 report said “women who have greater influence in decision-making can promote better healthcare practices for the family. Women's participation in household decisions decreases stunting among children and reduces child mortality” (Africa News, 2007c).

The impact of poverty in Uganda is profoundly felt through a lack of funds and resources to buy livestock. “Animal-source foods…are an important component of children’s diets, as a major source of protein and micronutrients” (Black et al., 2008). Yet in Uganda, many families can only afford meat once a year, if that (Tuller, 2007). This excludes them from access to adequate sources of protein and iron in the diet – key nutrients in preventing maternal and child mortality. Low intake of meat, fish, and/or poultry is associated with iron-deficiency anemia in mothers, which is an important contributor to maternal mortality as it increases the risk of dying with blood loss during delivery (Black et al., 2008). Mothers who die while the child is still an infant poses additional risks for newborns, as they no longer have their mothers to breastfeed them. Grandparents, particularly grandmothers, are left to care for 50% of orphans in Uganda (Africa News, 2007c); however, milk production of grandmothers is not nearly as sufficient as would be necessary for the child to thrive. If women were empowered within the household and within the government, they could push for better access to livestock which could drastically improve the nutritional and economic situations of many Ugandans.

The importance of farming and agriculture to nutritional status, as well as the social and economic development of Uganda, cannot be overstated. Farming is a critical aspect of the economy of Uganda; one women professed that “African business is agriculture” (Stuart, 2007). However, the current cropping systems in Uganda are leading to nutritional deficiencies and are also threatened by climate change. Uganda would do well to consider alternative agricultural strategies; over the past few years, the National Academies released a series of books entitled “The Lost Crops of Africa,” which enforces the promise of many crops that are native to Africa, but are not currently widely harvested (The National Academies Press, 2006).

There are currently two main cropping systems in Uganda: a grain-based system in the northern and western regions, and a banana-based one in the central, southern, and eastern regions (McIntyre, Bouldin, Urey, & Kizito, 2001). Since livestock farming is not a large contributor to nutrient intake in Uganda, this leads to low protein intake in the banana farming areas, as the banana-based system has been found to be associated with nutritional deficits of protein in addition to calcium, iron, and zinc. Zinc deficiency is associated with stunting prevalence, and both iron and zinc deficiencies have both been shown to be associated with increased cognitive impairment among children (Black et al., 2008). A different study found that the local variety of bananas is low in iron, iodine, and Vitamin A (Eliot, 2008) – the three micronutrients that are most deficient in Ugandans’ diets (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002).

In addition, diminished crop yields due to seasonal variation and crop infestation compromises the nutritional quality of bananas (Stuart, 2007). Addressing banana stem infestations is one solution, as weevil and nematode infestations in the roots of banana plants lead to a decreased absorbance of vitamins, minerals, and water by the plant (Stuart, 2007). Drought and soil degradation may compound the effects of the diseased stems, leading to lower yields and quality of bananas. Using tissue-cultured banana plants with endophytes (good microbes) reintroduced to the plant at an early stage would help to increase the plant’s natural defenses before it is planted in the field. A sensitization campaign was supposedly started in 2008 to educate Ugandans on the adoption of growing tissue-cultured banana plants – something that has already been started in Kenya (Stuart, 2007). Another potential solution is genetically modified bananas, which have been developed in Australia and are currently undergoing field testing in Uganda (Eliot, 2008).

Strategies have also been proposed to alter the land area’s crop selection. Initiatives which set out to introduce new crops to farmers and broaden the range of crops planted may hold promise in improving the diet quality of Ugandans; the Uganda Bean Program is one such example of success (McIntyre et al., 2001). The Vice President of Uganda discusses the role of maize flour in the diet as contributing to stunting, as its high phytate content contributes to zinc malabsorption, and “zinc deficiency contributes significantly to stunting and impaired cognitive development” (Africa News, 2007b). He offers the suggestion of providing children with more “millet, soya, and sorghum, which are easily available in Uganda” (Africa News, 2007b). The Ugandan government could be instrumental in providing aid to the development and implementation of alternative agricultural strategies, as well as facilitating the distribution of higher nutritional quality food.

Agriculture is inextricably linked with the HIV/AIDS epidemic, as the practice makes available food and nutrition that are of critical importance in fighting the disease (Africa News, 2008; Tuller, 2007). David Tuller, a graduate student from the University of California, San Francisco, spent five months in Uganda investigating whether “food insecurity…undermines the effectiveness of HIV treatment” (Tuller, 2007). Far too often, parents must choose between feeding their children and selling their crops to make the money needed for the “monthly clinic trip for the medication that keeps them alive” – a trip that also means a missed opportunity for gardening or other work (Tuller, 2007). Compounding the issue of food insecurity among people with HIV/AIDS is the issue of power struggles between men and women. Hunger and food insecurity put women at the mercy of their husbands, who will oftentimes demand unprotected sex in exchange for bringing food home (Tuller, 2007). In this way poverty, food insecurity, and gender disparities interact to prolong the HIV epidemic and continue the plight of the disenfranchised.

The government has a role to play in improving food security in urbanized areas as well. Although stunting is twice as prevalent in rural areas as urban ones, people are moving to urban slums in greater numbers, leading to higher rates of stunting in urban areas (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002). Malnutrition in urban areas is a very real issue, but strategies such as urban agriculture could help curb food insecurity. Urban agriculture has traditionally formed an informal safety net for buffering the impact of economic hardship and the cutbacks of urban subsidies and formal safety nets. However, urban farming is currently not endorsed by the government and is actually illegal, despite its positive association with decreased rates of stunting (Maxwell, Levin, & Csete, 1998). Officials of local and national governments do not recognize benefits that urban farming could have on health; they actually consider it a threat to public health and generally overlook or even discourage it (Maxwell et al., 1998). There is plenty of idle land available in cities that could easily be used for urban farming if policymakers recognized its importance in enhancing food security and made the legal framework more conducive to informal livelihood strategies.

Perhaps the most important thing the government could do to increase food security and improve its country’s maternal and child health is to form community partnerships (UNICEF, 2008). Engaging the community in the promotion of its own health is critical to the success of any intervention, as it builds capacity and empowers its members. Governments should engage in intersectoral collaboration and work cooperatively on community, district, and national levels to include all members of a community in policy and decision-making processes, particularly women. By including women in policy and decision-making, this may help change the ethos of gender discrimination and ultimately lead to improved diets and access to healthy environments for women and children. As UNICEF posits, “the ultimate responsibility for ensuring children’s rights to health and nutrition lies with national governments in partnership with civil society” (UNICEF, 2008).

Local authorities, research establishments, and development agencies should “work with the urban poor to understand and develop other urban food and livelihood security strategies” (Maxwell et al., 1998). A key facet of community partnerships involves community growth promotion, or the recruitment of community health workers to bring health education to the communities door-to-door. This may include educating caregivers on the importance of exclusive breastfeeding, health, nutrition, numeracy, and literacy, and improving the capacity of women in a community to recognize malnutrition (Alderman, 2007). Rates of exclusive breastfeeding are declining throughout the world, which is problematic because there is a higher risk of morbidity and mortality from suboptimum breastfeeding (Black et al., 2008). Similarly, “suboptimum complementary feeding is clearly a determinant of stunting” (Black et al., 2008). Infectious diseases, particularly those that result in diarrhea, reduce intestinal absorption of nutrients and thereby are large contributors to stunting (Black et al., 2008). Educating women on these health issues could not only lead to lower stunting rates and improved health outcomes for children, but could also improve capacity, decrease dependence, and even improve the economy.

Farming and community growth promotion are both associated with decreased prevalence of stunting in children. One study found significantly less stunting in children from farming households than children from non-farming households (Maxwell et al., 1998). Also, there are more moderately and severely undernourished children in non-farming households than in farming households among lower socio-economic households (Maxwell et al., 1998). Farming has been proposed as a good female income-generating activity, and allows mothers to spend more time caring for their children (Maxwell et al., 1998). Evidence shows that community growth promotion, including education and skills training on early childhood development, can have an impact on children’s diets in Uganda. In a longitudinal intervention study, training focused on breastfeeding, complementary feeding at time of weaning, and diet diversification (Alderman, 2007). Improvements were seen in children’s diets in their first year or two of life with long-term intervention exposure, which is significant because the first two years of life are the most critical in a child’s physical and cognitive development (Africa News, 2008).

In the north, political upheaval compromises the social capital and economic potential of certain populations residing in Uganda, making self-sufficiency more difficult. Rebel groups in northern Uganda pose a serious threat to the health and well-being of the population. Northern Uganda is plagued by the Lord’s Resistance Army’s terrorist activities, which makes access to food difficult and takes children out of school. This is especially true in Karamoja, where fewer than twenty percent of children attend school because they must help out with the farming at home (Grainger, 2007). To make matters worse, droughts are drastically reducing the amount of crops to harvest, and two-thirds of the region is dependent on foreign food aid such as from the World Food Programme (Africa News, 2007a; Grainger, 2007).

In addition, northern Uganda is home to a significant number of refugees relocating to Uganda from neighboring countries. In 2005, there were nearly 188,000 refugees in Uganda from Sudan alone (Kaiser, 2005). Although the majority of refugees currently in Uganda have been there since the 1980’s and 1990’s, the government of Uganda has outright rejected the notion for permanent integration of refugees into the Ugandan population (Kaiser, 2005). Yet refugees are not even granted the right to freedom of movement, and experience insecurity, deprivation, and political repression in the north (Kaiser, 2005).

Refugees in Uganda have consistently been the victims of social exclusion, defined by Manuel Castells as “the process by which certain individuals and groups are systemically barred from access to positions that would enable them to an autonomous livelihood within the social standards framed by institutions and values in a given context” (Castells, 2000). The Ugandan government has attempted to implement the “Self-Reliance Strategy” (SRS) to provide services to refugees in such a way that it would improve the socioeconomic development of both the refugees and their Ugandan hosts. The idea was for services for refugees to be integrated into regular government structures and policies. It was envisioned that refugees would be able to grow or buy their own food, access and pay for basic services, and maintain self-sustaining community structures (Kaiser, 2005). While the SRS program was successful in one region that had considerable political stability, in most other areas refugees were often relocated from one unsafe area to another, not informed of what was going on, and regularly denied access to a range of economic activities. In attempting to fulfill the material needs of the refugee population, their legal and political rights have not been maintained. As a result of this social exclusion, the building of capacity, self-esteem, and social resources has been hindered, consequently undermining the goals of the program (Kaiser, 2005). This has implications for nutrition outcomes in that the crux of a successful, sustainable public health intervention relies on a community’s social capital and solidarity.

There is much evidence of the negative impact of political activities on nutritional status. Granaries have been abandoned in the north due to increased political insecurity, which adds to the problem of recurrent drought and seasonal variation that threaten household food security (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002). Political insecurity has also made the delivery of health-promotion services in these areas more difficult (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002). There was a statistical difference in stunting prevalence in sub-counties depending on distance to the health center, with populations who lived further away experiencing greater rates of stunting (Jilcott et al., 2007). This underlines the significance of lack of access to health-promoting resources, as management of malnutrition is primarily facility-based in Uganda (Jilcott et al., 2007). In addition, for those in the areas with the worst malnutrition, such as Karamoja, the health and therapeutic feeding centers are regularly overcrowded, which raises the risk of cross-infections and hypothermia from sleeping on the floor (Africa News, 2007a). Indeed, as UNICEF puts it, “cultural and climatic factors as well as endemic conflict combine to create cyclic humanitarian crises of a disastrous scale and complexity” (Africa News, 2007a).

While the intentions of programs such as the SRS are noteworthy, their implementation and outcomes have not been quite as stellar. The government must be sure to be sensitive to the realities of life when developing intervention programs. It must balance its own interests with its citizens, and those of the refugees in the north, in order to mitigate the detrimental effects of conflict on both populations. Chen and Berlinguer state that “good health is the cornerstone of economic progress, a multiplier of society’s human resources, and, indeed, the primary objective of development” (Chen & Berlinguer, 2001). Therefore, vesting more interest in the rights of refugees in terms of the SRS would allow these individuals more autonomy and access to health-promoting resources, ultimately benefitting the country of Uganda as a whole.

One intervention that has been moderately successful but has encountered some difficulties is the distribution of Vitamin A supplements. Vitamin A deficiencies have been common in Uganda, and while the vitamin is fat-soluble, Ugandans’ main source of Vitamin A is green leafy vegetables (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002). Ugandans’ diets are low in fat, especially as a result of the insufficient contribution of animal sources to their diet. Inadequate quantities of Vitamin A in mothers’ diets lead to Vitamin A deficient breastmilk (Black et al., 2008). The Ministry of Health’s national protocol for Vitamin A supplementation for postpartum mothers has been moderately successful at reducing Vitamin A deficiencies in Uganda, with a current coverage rate of 78% in children 6-59 months old (UNICEF, 2008). However, there are many barriers to the success of supplement distribution in Uganda. The country lacks a well-defined system for the distribution of the capsules, as they are only readily accessible to mothers who use health facilities (Bachou & Labadarios, 2002). In addition, capsule supplementation may not be ideal in the north due to the political instability, and in many of the isolated, rural areas of the country, as serious barriers may be encountered in attempting to distribute supplements to both of these populations. Additionally, supplementation is not a sustainable solution, but a downstream intervention that does not get to the root of the problem of inadequate Vitamin A in the food that is consumed. Micronutrient supplementation may be successful in improving child health outcomes in the short term, but in order to “eliminate stunting in the longer term, these interventions should be supplemented by improvements in the underlying determinants of undernutrition, such as poverty, poor education, disease burden, and lack of women's empowerment” (Bhutta et al., 2008).

Community partnerships have proven successful in decreasing rates of stunting in India (UNICEF, 2008), and will likewise be critical to successful public health interventions as Uganda moves forward. The government’s first priority should be inclusion of women in decision and policymaking, and building intersectoral collaboration. These collaborations should then prioritize nutrition issues, improving food security in Uganda such as through supporting alternative cropping strategies and changing its stance on urban agriculture. At the same time, it should support education on breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices through community growth promotion. In the Lancet’s 2008 series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition, Bhutta et. al concluded that “in populations with sufficient food, education about complementary feeding increased height-for-age Z score by 0.25…, whereas provision of food supplements (with or without education) in populations with insufficient food increased the height-for-age Z score by 0.41” (Bhutta et al., 2008). Stunting is inextricably tied to social, economic and political issues, so in order to decrease its prevalence, improve maternal and child health, and improve the future development of Uganda, the role of policy and community partnerships should be seriously considered.

References

Africa News. (2007a, September 27). Uganda: Malnutrition the Main Challenge in Karamoja's Chronic Emergency. Africa News: UN Integrated Regional Information Networks.
Africa News. (2007b, February 3). Uganda: The Hidden Brain Hunger. Africa News: The Monitor.
Africa News. (2007c, March 8). Women and Gender: UN - Women Still Play Second Fiddle. Africa News: The East African Standard.
Africa News. (2008, April 30). Uganda: Early Prevention is Best, Says Child Malnutrition Study. Africa News: The Monitor.
Alderman, H. (2007). Improving Nutrition Through Community Growth Promotion: Longitudinal Study of the Nutrition and Early Child Development Program in Uganda. World Development, 35(8), 1376-1389.
Bachou, H., & Labadarios, D. (2002). The Nutrition Situation in Uganda. Nutrition, 18(4), 356-358.
Bhutta, Z. A., Ahmed, T., Black, R. E., Cousens, S., Dewey, K., Giugliani, E., et al. (2008). What Works: Interventions for Maternal and Child Undernutrition and Survival. The Lancet, 371(9610), 417-440.
Black, R. E., Allen, L. H., Bhutta, Z. A., Caulfield, L. E., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., et al. (2008). Maternal and Child Undernutrition: Global and Regional Exposures and Health Consequences. The Lancet, 371(9608), 243-260.
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Fourth World. In D. Held, & A. McGrew (Eds.), The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate (pp. 348). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chen, L., & Berlinguer, G. (2001). Health Equity in a Globalizing World. In T. e. a. Evans (Ed.), Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action (pp. 34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eliot, J. (2008, March 5). Uganda Health Gets Hand. The Cairns Post (Australia), pp. 31.
Grainger, S. (2007, 19 January). Surviving Uganda's Cattle Wars. BBC News.
Jilcott, S. B., Masso, K. L., Ickes, S. B., Myhre, S. D., & Myhre, J. A. (2007). Surviving But Not Quite Thriving: Anthropometric Survey of Children Aged 6 to 59 Months in a Rural Western Uganda District. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(11), 1983-1988.
Kaiser, T. (2005). Participating in Development? Refugee Protection, Politics and Developmental Approaches to Refugee Management in Uganda. Third World Quarterly, 26(2), 351-367.
Maxwell, D., Levin, C., & Csete, J. (1998). Does Urban Agriculture Help Prevent Malnutrition? Evidence from Kampala. Food Policy, 23(5), 411-424.
McIntyre, B. D., Bouldin, D. R., Urey, G. H., & Kizito, F. (2001). Modeling Cropping Strategies to Improve Human Nutrition in Uganda. Agricultural Systems, 67(2), 105-120.
Nadakavukaren, A. (2006). Our Global Environment, A Health Perspective (6th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
Stuart, P. (2007, Bananas--Science Comes to the Rescue. African Business, 332, 58.
The National Academies Press. (2006). Lost Crops of Africa: Volume II: Vegetables. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Tuller, D. (2007, December 25). Food Scarcity and H.I.V. Interwoven in Uganda. The New York Times, pp. 6.
UNICEF. (2008). The State of the World's Children.
Victora, C. G., Adair, L., Fall, C., Hallal, P. C., Martorell, R., Richter, L., et al. (2008). Maternal and Child Undernutrition: Consequences for Adult Health and Human Capital. The Lancet, 371(9609), 340-357.